Category Archives: Heat Sinks

Mentor Grapics Webinar: Heat Sink 201 – Even More About Heatsink Design; 5/19 & 5/20 11AM taught by Dr. John Parry, CEng

Another great webinar is coming up on how to design a heat sink. This time it’s sponsored by Mentor Graphics and taught by Dr. John Parry. Entitled, “Heat Sink 201 – Even More About Heatsink Design” You can register to attend either on 5/19 or on 5/20 at 11AM.

Mentor provides a description of their course:

In this webinar we will discuss how manufacturer’s data is obtained, and why this may not be applicable for use in design by showing a simple example of how a heatsink interacts locally with the surrounding airflow.

We will illustrate why heatsinks are not as simple to use as they first appear, and why they should be designed for a particular application. We will also talk more about the myths surrounding heatsinks and their application, and give some practical advice concerning heatsink design and attachment. The presentation will conclude by looking at different optimization strategies for heatsink design.

At ATS we couldn’t agree more. This is a terrific topic. As we’ve noted in past posts here, such as our post, “The Fallacy of the Drop-In Replacement Heat Sink” a heat sink is not necessarily a heat sink. And the published data isn’t always accurate.

There are a number of vectors of influence in heat sink design and application. For example, the TIM (thermal interface material) and attachment method can have dramatic effects on the thermal efficiency. In our testing here in ATS’s Thermal Labs, we’ve found that a simple straight fin heat sink can have a significantly better thermal performance when a proper attachment method and phase change material TIM are used.

You can register for Mentor Graphics webinar at the following link: “Heat Sink 201 – even more about heat sink design“.

Should you find you need help designing your next generation heat sink or thermal management solution ATS’s world class design team, deep CFD capability and Tier 1 class thermal development lab can lend you a hand. Click through to learn more about ATS Thermal Management Design Consulting Services or tell us a bit about your project through our on-line project submission: Thermal Design On-Line Project Request.

Liquid Cooling and Two Phase Cooling: A Case Study to Examine the Tradeoffs for a “Best” Solution

Electronics Cooling has published a study by Anurag Gupta, David H. Altman and Stephen J. Pereira to demonstrate the trade-offs between liquid and two-phase cooling schemes for small-channel heat sinks in high heat flux applications.

The study is a fascinating examination of the topic and has some interesting results that are worth noting. Applications for liquid cooling are growing and understand the tradeoffs in different approaches is a critical element in determining an engineers best options.

You can read the study at Electronics Cooling by clicking to this link: a case study to demonstrate the trade-offs between liquid and two-phase cooling schemes for small-channel heat sinks in high heat flux applications

Adaptive Cooling in Datacenters; an ATS Thermal Management “How To” white paper

If you caught our earlier post today featuring Google’s Bill Weihl, you know there are many issues related to having an energy efficient datacenter. Thermal management is part of that as well. So while you might have the best heat sink and system cooling design, that heat still has to be dealt with once it comes out of the system. At ATS we think about heat transfer from chip to datacenter. In our latest white paper on this topic we cover what an adaptive cooling approach might look like for a datacenter. We use a sample 4 MW center with 100 racks of servers for our exercise and consider what needs to be considered in order to develop such an adaptive cooling solution to the thermal management of a datacenter. Download you free copy from ATS here: “Adaptive Cooling in Data Centers“

Intel’s nano-technology breakthrough for heat sinks has R&D promise but real-world applications are in the future; An ATS thermal management technology analysis

Just last week, Intel Corporation (Santa Clara, CA) earned U.S. Patent 7,704,791 for packaging of integrated circuits with carbon nanotube arrays to enhance heat dissipation through a thermal interface.

On the surface of it, this sounds like an exciting development in thermal management and heat sink invention, as noted in the article written by Alton Parrish on the news site “Before It’s News“:

According to inventors Valery M. Dubin and Thomas S. Dory a layer of metal is formed on a backside of a semiconductor wafer. Then, a porous layer is formed on the metal layer. A barrier layer of the porous layer at the bottom of the pores is thinned down. Then, a catalyst is deposited at the bottom of the pores. Carbon nanotubes are then grown in the pores. Another layer of metal is then formed over the porous layer and the carbon nanotubes. The semiconductor wafer is then separated into microelectronic dies. The dies are bonded to a semiconductor substrate, a heat spreader is placed on top of the die, and a semiconductor package resulting from such assembly is sealed. A thermal interface is formed on the top of the heat spreader. Then a heat sink is placed on top of the thermal interface.

Nano-carbon tube based materials have promised a revolution in thermal interface material technology but have never really delivered. In fact, many of us in thermal engineering have been anxiously awaiting a breakthrough development using nano-technology.
Nano-carbon tube technology has a lot of promise to solve the age old problem of contact resistance. The promise of nano-technology includes a few approaches from growing it on the semiconductor chip and eliminating TIM1 to growing it on the backside of the heat sink and minimizing or eliminating TIM2.

Unfortunately, many of these venture funded companies are no longer in business as the technologies maturation and commercialization simply hasn’t been there. From our vantage point as thermal scientists and engineers at ATS, nano-materials are an attractive proposition in certain university or corporate laboratories; with funding you can experiment and see if these technologies lead someplace. However, the real world issues of production in volume, sustaining production quality, cost, application and the biggest of all – the environmental hazard (nano-carbon tube has similar characteristics as asbestos) continue to create barriers to the real world utility of nano-carbon tube materials. While being a fascinating material to work with, the widespread, real world applications are limited at this juncture of technology life cycle and perhaps for the foreseeable future.

Perhaps most useful to the thermal management industry and to real world thermal engineering problems would be a comparison between nano-material based heat sinks and Aluminum or Copper; especially on a cost performance basis. ATS did a comparison between three geometrically identical heat sinks made of Copper, Aluminum and High-performance Graphite (though not nano-tube) and we did not see any difference. Surprisingly, the only advantage that high-performance Graphite offered was its light-weight, but, thermally and mechanically it was the worst (readers may download a copy of our study at ECNMag.com at this link: “Comparing the Impact of Different Heat Sink Materials on Cooling Performance“).

If we extrapolate our concerns and findings in our study to a heat sink made of nano-carbon tube material, (laying aside environmental factors and poor performance as nano-carbon tubes are isotropic – heat goes only in one direction), cost is a concern. Today’s electronics’ market is highly cost sensitive to their thermal development budget on a given project. Also, RoHS compliance is mandatory and studies are continuing on the health impact of nano-technology materials. Such work may not yield products for another five to 10 years. For the latest in the U.S. National Initiative in nano-scale technology, please visit the NNI’s 2011 Budget Supplement and Annual Report.

ATS applauds Intel for thinking out of the box and trying to create new ways of approaching the issue of thermal management. Semiconductor companies such as Intel who see themselves as part of the solution to thermal management are welcomed as fellow travellers to cooler and more reliable electronics.

Does thermal grease used for heat sinks have a long term reliability risk? An ATS Thermal Labs White Paper

Thermal Grease used as thermal interface material for heat sinks is perhaps the best material today. It’s relatively cost effective and just plain works. But, as in all thermal management products, it’s not perfect and there are drawbacks that have to be considered.

In ATS Thermal Labs latest white paper, we talk about those drawbacks an in particular if there are issues of long term reliability in using thermal grease as a thermal interface material. The implications are very important as they will affect your electronic equipments MTBF. You can get a copy by clicking to this link, “Long Term Thermal Grease Reliability“