Tag Archives: thermal management

ATS Engineering Services Targets PCB Thermal Management and Reduce Heat Sinks

Optimizing PCBs for thermal management has been proven to ensure reliability, speed time to market and reduce overall costs. ATS provides a range of PCB thermal design services, from CFD studies on boards at the CAD stage to wind-tunnel testing of actual or dummy boards in conditions that simulate air distribution in actual applications. To learn more as well as how to purchase please visit our site at this link: PCB Thermal Board Analysis Service

ATS New video on ATVS-2020 demos a great thermal analysis instrument to design your next heat sink

We’ve just finished our latest video, demoing our ATVS-2020 Automatic Temperature & Velocity Scanner. It’s a great tool, useful for a whole variety of  research and engineering work. We primarily developed it because our team  needed an accurate and portable temperature and velocity scanner to do our our own thermal analysis of system chassis for heat sink engineering and thermal management development. After using it for a bit, we decided to offer it up on the market and it’s been a great tool for engineers doing thermal analysis, research and engineering.

One of the great things about our ATVS-2020 is that it includes a terrific application called stageVIEW. stageVIEW,  built on National Instruments LabVIEW, actually automates your entire test process. This includes varying the test parameters and collecting data. If you haven’t seen a demo, you owe it to yourself to take a look.

The icing on the cake for our ATVS-2020 is our Candlestick Sensor.  The genesis of our Candlestick Sensor was simple: we kept breaking standard temperature and velocity sensors. Standard temperature and velocity measurement sensors are very brittle and when you break a lot of them the cost adds up. So, we had to come up with a solution and the Candlestick Sensor was born. It’s flexible, doesn’t break AND it measure both air temperature and air velocity.

Here’s the video on our ATVS-2020:

Copper Heat Sinks? Aluminum Heat Sinks? Does it matter what you make a heat sink from?

True or False?  Heat sink materials make a difference in how efficient a heat sink will be?

Well, like a lot of things in thermal management, it depends on the constraints of your application. Neither copper heat sinks nor aluminum heat sinks are always the default choice.

108K different push pin heat sink assembly configurations featuring 3 different pitch heat sink types, 3 different fin geometries, brass and plastic push pins

 

Recently, ATS performed a study to provide some clarity to users on how different “standard” materials act as heat sinks. Our study included copper heat sinks, aluminum heat sinks and graphite foam heat sinks. We published our article in ECN under the title, “Comparing the Impact of Different Heat Sink Materials on Cooling Performance“.

The results of our study were quite interesting.  As you can see from the following graph, graphite was a good material but not the best. Copper and Aluminum performed better and similarly.

Comparison of copper, aluminum and graphite foam heat sinks

Our conclusions were:

  • Copper and Aluminum are very close in thermal performance. If weight is an issue or cost, then Aluminum is the way to go. The size of your heat sink or the thermal interface material can often make the difference too.
  • Pure copper has about 2x the conductivity of aluminum but that inherent advantage is only helpful when
  1. Air Flow speeds are 800LFM
  2. The hot spot on the CPU or other semiconductor is small in comparison to the size of the chip itself.
  • When air flow is 400LFM or lower or the hot spot on the CPU or semiconductor is spread throughout the chip, then Aluminum is a better choice.
  • The cost of a copper heatsink is often up to 3x the equivalent sized aluminum heatsink
  • Graphite foam-derived heat sinks show promise in specific applications, but exhibit several drawbacks in mainstream electronics cooling.

You can read the full study at ECN by clicking to “Comparing the Impact of Different Heat Sink Materials on Cooling Performance“. You can also check out our earlier conversations on this topic by clicking to our posts, “Is CPU Cooling best done with a Copper Heatsink or Aluminum Heatsink?” and “Intel’s nano-technology breakthrough for heat sinks has R&D promise but real-world applications are in the future; An ATS thermal management technology analysis”

Also, if you are a member of Linked-In, there is a Thermal Management group that is worth joining, plus, there is a sub-group off of that focusing on next generation materials for heat sinks. Well worth joining!

ATS Thermal Management Case Studies show real world thermal problems and solutions

We’ve written a number of case studies on thermal analysis and thermal design for LED Lights, thermally optimizing a PCB, and even liquid cooling. We thought we’d put them in one place up to now to make them easier to find. You can do this yourself as well by clicking on the drop down box “blog article categories” in the right hand column of our blog and choosing the category “case study”.

LED Lights:

Telecommunciations

Homeland Security

PCB:

Semiconductor Automatic Test Equipment

System Level Optimization

Computer High Power Boards

Liquid Cooling

How to choose a heat sink attachment method to secure your heat sink and for optimal heat transfer (part 2 of 2)

In part 1 of our 2 part series, we laid the ground work for our two part series by noting that there are six main methods you can use to secure a heat sink to a semiconductor

  1. Thermal Tape
  2. Epoxy
  3. Wire Form Z-Clips
  4. Clips
  5. Threaded Stand-offs (PEMS) and Compression Springs
  6. Push-Pins and Compression Springs

In part one we covered thermal tape, epoxy and wire form z-clips. In part two we’ll cover clips, push pins and stand offs and have a special offer for our readers to get all this information in a handy download.

Commercial heat sink clip and ATS maxiGRIP heat sink clip Heat Sink Clips: Heat sink clips are Plastic or plastic/wire clips that grip the components. They are a step above z-clips in ease of use and application. Where a Z-Clip requires a PCB anchor, standard heat sink clips do not. In fact, as long as you have keep out area available around a chip and height available, a clip is a great option. There are many options in using a clip. There are very basic clips, such as those from Malico, which quickly and easily hold a heat sink onto a semiconductor and more advanced clips such as what we at ATS offer in our maxiGRIP and superGRIP clips. The main benefits of a clip are, first, they apply a pre-load to the TIM (thermal interface material) improving thermal performance. Second, they require no holes or anchors in the PCB. This is a very big benefit since clips do not reduce the trace space available for board layout. Third, clips make rework easy by allowing heat sinks to be easily removed and reapplied without damaging the PCB board. Finally, some clips, like maxiGRIP and superGRIP provide a strong enough mechanical attach to pass NEBS, ETSI and MIL shock and vibration. There are some downsides that need to be noted though. First, designers need to insure they design in some keep out area around the semiconductors so that a clip can be used. That also assumes that the design team has considered a thermal management strategy during the architect phase of the product too. Secondly, clips do add extra assembly time since they have to be manually applied.

heat sink being attached to a board using a PEMThreaded Standoffs (PEMS): These are threaded mechanical assemblies that offer the highest level of retention and stability. This approaches benefits include, first, that they are a strong mechanically. They will pass shock and vibe for NEBS, ETSI and MIL.  Second, they provide the highest TIM preload, insuring excellent performance from whatever thermal interface material you choose. Third, they are ideal for heavy copper heat sinks. Finally, they make installation and rework easy since a simple unscrewing of the attach allows the non-destructive removal of the heat sink.  But, as with all heat sink attach methods, there are a few drawbacks to consider. First, they require holes in the PCB removing valuable space for trace. Second they tend to be expensive, especially given that holes need to be drilled into a PCB board to use them.

push pin attach for heat sinks Push-Pins: These are generally plastic or brass push-pin that offer quick and easy mechanical attachment. They are generally equally strong to a threaded standoff (PEMs) approach to heat sink attach. Push pins offer a very strong TIM preload as well as being ideal for large, heavy copper heat sinks. Some of the drawbacks include requiring holes in the PCB board which reduces the trace length space available, a generally complicated assembly process, and finally a fairly high price relative to other solutions.

That wraps up our two part series on heat sink attachment options.

Special offer for our readers to get all this information in a handy download
There’s a lot of material in our two part series on heat sink attachment. To make referencing our series quicker, we’ve assembled this material into a two page “Resource Guide” completed with images as a handy reminder during your next thermal management project.To get a copy, simply drop some email to us at [email protected] with the words, “HEAT SINK ATTACH OFFER” in the subject line and we’ll send a copy to you.

If you’re looking for a solution on heat sink attachment and need to bounce this off us, feel free to! ATS sells various heat sinks attachment options, of course, and we’ll talk about that next time, but we’re happy just to discuss your options in your application, so call us at 781-769-2800, email us at [email protected] or visit our website at http://qats.com